Like most of you I primarily use Quantcast and Compete to measure the traffic of other websites.  When someone happens to hook me up I use Comscore as well.  BlackVoices.com looks to have had a huge dip in traffic on sites like Quantcast and compete.  this is largely because they are not classified into a network, Comscore’s equivalent to a media type (M).  being classified this way has it’s benefits especially if you are hard at work serving niches as part of your strategy.  September Comscore numbers show that Black Voices is actually at about 4.9M unique visitors (October numbers aren’t out yet) classified as a media type.  I chatted briefly with Tariq Muhammad today about Black Voices’ new strategy.

How many domains does Black Voices currently use?
A total of 13.

If traffic isn’t coming from the main domain as much how are you all getting so much traffic to the other domains?  SEO?  SEM?
It’s absolutely a mix of partners, SEO, and other forms of marketing and partnerships.  Traffic does come from the main domain as well and we send them to blogs from there.  I do want to note that we are eager and open to partnering with all manner of sites.  It took a while to shake off our walled garden heritage of AOL but that thinking has change throughout the company over the past 2 years or so and has evolved.  It makes a lot more sense for us to be open and partner.  If you can’t come to Black Voice’s to find all types of black voices we are not fulfilling our mission.

Do you have a network or will you be building a network of sites?
Yes and No.  We could be classified as a network however form a positioning stand point we aren’t.  If I were to launch other sites that had a different slant it would roll-up into Black Voices still.  All of our sites now are part of the Black Voices constituency and would not exist had Black Voices not existed.  They are more like spin-offs.  They are an organic network of blogs and sites that have spawned from Black Voices.  In comparison to like a Gawker, they all have distinct audiences.  When we use the term ‘Blogs’ it is more a description of what we use for the CMS than descriptive of being a network of blogs.

What will eventually happen to BlackVoices.com, will it just be a landing page of sorts that collects all content, what role does it play in your new strategy?
We want to serve the niche content spaces and build them up as individual brands as well.  These sites will help feed BlackVoices.com which will showcases the best content across our network of blogs.

AOL has been reported to have hired about 7,000 journalist and is moving in the direction of being a content company, what does this mean for BlackVoices?
It means we will be ramping up even more in terms of content and are working to include as many diverse group of voices as we can.  We want to leave no viewpoint unturned.  We rely on original content while other AOL sites might rely on a different content mix, using content from AP and other services.  We are looking for contributors for additional blogs as well as contributors to the current blogs we have.  The contributors we are looking for don’t necessarily have to have a blog either, it may includes someone with a large social media presence.  We are open to the possibilities however they may present themselves.

What can we look out for from Black Voices in the coming weeks and months?
We will be ramping up in video.  We currently have a video podcast (it is distributed on multiple platforms not just iTunes) that we will be revamping.  We also have BV Daily Drama which is popular and shows the best clips from today’s TV shows.  Our message boards will be relaunching with Facebook, twitter, and MySpace intergration.  We were using a 3rd party service but brought that in-house and tested it in both alpha and beta phases.  That will relaunch next week on Wednesday but you can get a preview if you go to Conversations.BlackVoices.com

Some of the most liveliest discussions here in the past have occurred around topics related to advertising networks.  Most of us have been an associated with an ad network at some point in time, some of us still are, while others have moved on to an ad rep or direct sales.  When joining an ad network or engaging an ad rep firm some sort of contract must be signed, however these contracts are far from boilerplate and most of us simply aren’t lawyers or don’t have the resources to retain one.  Here are 10+ things to consider when joining an ad rep firm:

1. Post-Term
If a rep firm or ad network has a post-term in the contract, where they still get paid on advertising (if they introduce your site to the advertiser)  you broker yourself or via another firm after the contract has ended , you should kill it if you can. Once the contract is up, the publisher needs to be totally free to do what he/she wants to do, without any claim to future revenues.  Gorilla Nation includes a post-term in their contracts.

2. Performance Clause
I would recommend some type of ratio of performance, where the ad rep firm is responsible to perform at a particular level. Especially, if a publisher has an exclusive deal, you need to make sure you are getting sufficient consideration every month if you are giving up exclusivity. You can put a performance clause in the contract such as for every 1M pageviews, the publisher needs to get 2K net revenue from the exclusive rep firm. If the site does 10M pageviews, the rep firm must perform and sell at least 20K per month on premium direct sales and if they don’t for 2-3 consecutive months, you should be able to get out of the contract. If a rep firm has a “star property” or anchor property, they will most likely focus on that property when pitching to advertisers, leaving the smaller publishers behind.

In addition to a performance clause, you need a clause that says the rep firm is responsible to provide with a quality service level. You want to think of as many “outs” as possible, with “outs” being options to get out of your contract.

3.  Leave Some Room to Sell Some of Your Inventory on Your Own
Leave some room for you to handle some of your direct sales. It’s important for publishers to build traffic and scale first but if you grow very fast, you need the flexibility to start selling a portion of your own ads, with your own direct sales team. You could select a category such as music to focus on and give the rest to the rep firm. As you get bigger and stronger, you can then negotiate more away from the rep firm.

4. Play Rep Firms Against Each Other
Negotiate from a position of power, once you find more than one rep firm that is interested, you should use this interest as leverage. “X is offering me a better deal, can you beat these terms”

5. Set Your Own Rate Card, Don’t rely on the rep firm
This needs to be in the contract. The rep firm may be trying to sell you too low or too high. You need full flexibility to determine the pricing of your brand/site. You can work with the rep firm but you should have complete control over your rate card.

6. Ask How Many Account Reps do they have per site within your vertical
If the reps are overly stretched and your site doesn’t have a large following 500 UV’s+, don’t expect a lot of attention and support.

7. Net Payment Terms
Anything beyond net 60 is suspect.  However, if the CPM’s are high and the partner has a good reputation, I think you can go with 90 but nothing beyond net 90.

8. Misc Fees Deducted from Your Revenue, on top of the revenue split
Beware of shady terms such as the ad network or rep firm having the ability to deduct fees from your revenue, in addition to the revenue share. Some firms will try to be slick and say they can deduct fees related to trafficking, ad serving, and sales, in addition to their revenue share. This is unacceptable and an obvious red flag.

9. How many employees does the rep firm have?
Beware of big promises. If a firm has 1-3 employees or the key executive you’re working with is working from home, these are obvious red flags. What this could mean is that this firm doesn’t have the bandwidth to effectively sell your brand to Fortune 500 companies.

10. Beware of firms that sell Black only, not Quality
If a rep firm is “selling” their business on the fact that is Black owned and not on the quality of their partners, sales, growth, financials, etc., this is a red flag.  You shouldn’t care who owns the rep firm and you should weigh firms on their merits and what they can do for your business.  Young “pro Black” publishers/bloggers often “buy into the kool aid” and get exploited by these type of ad shops. I personally had to threaten AdGroups after I smelled some “shady” dealings/practices. “I don’t care if you’re Black owned, where is my money?”

Bonus

11. Provision for M&A
If your website is acquired on a M&A deal, you need to be able to get out of the contract as an acquirer would most likely want to go in a different direction on ad sales. If you are “locked tight” into a contract, this may influence your deal price or prevent a deal from even going down. You need a “M&A out”.

12.  Beware of the Auto-renew
Some firms require a 30-45 days notice or they will auto rnew your contract and you could be stuck with them for another year.  Obviously this is not ideal especially if you are unhappy with the ad rep or they haven’t preformed to your expectations and you’d like to try alternatives.  If you are already in an auto-renew situation mark your calendar to send your contact termination notice.  Don’t get caught slippin’.  Gorilla Nation includes auto-renew in their standard contracts.

13. Consult an Online Advertising/New Media Lawyer No Matter What
Or someone who specializes in online advertising/new media. Even if you don’t have any money, you can find a lawyer who will work with you where you can pay them later or break up the balance into payments.  I don’t care how smart you think you are, if your site blows up, a bad deal or some “uneven” clause only a slick lawyer would understand who wrote the contract in the interest of the rep firm could end up costing you millions!

As of late we’ve seen so many traditional Black/Urban Media companies either redesign as blogs, create blog properties as part of their holdings, or transform their content channels into blogs.  In nearly every case that I’ve seen this happen not one company has been able to knock it out of the park.  In many cases they merely bunt it. Cases in point…

Vibe relaunching as a blog

Essence.com’s latest redesign

BlackVoices building up their stable of blogs that mirror content channels (BVonStyle,BVonSports, BVonMoney, etc.)

Interactive One adding blogs to their holdings and then tacking those properties on the BlackPlanet.com domain

You get the picture.

Surely blogs have some kind of undeniable allure.  In some cases they are guilty pleasures.  In Media they are the new kids on the block that some love to hate while others embrace.  In mainstream media there is M&A activity in the blogosphere.  Media companies don’t necessarily feel the need to recreate the wheel, challenge what already exists, or create their own.  Long term that would take too much time and resources.  They simply either take a strategic investment or acquire.

My biggest question and concern is why doesn’t this same activity happen in Black Media.  Instead of resulting to the typical “crabs in a barrel” answer I’m genuinely curious to find out what is missing in our economy that we have yet to see this type of activity in recent times.  Especially when Essence is feeling the backlash of their community on their new redesign, Black Voices’ traffic despite trying to incorporate blogs is in a huge slump, and of all Interactive One’s properties Black Planet still out shines many of their properties by light years.  If these companies wanted to diversify their portfolio by adding blogs or appeal to a young audience by “acting” like a blog wouldn’t it make more sense just to acquire a blog that is aligned with your brand and what you are trying to build?  You wouldn’t have to start from scratch, the traffic would already be there, and 9 times out of 10 the overhead would be ridiculously low….lower than the staff that is needed to “act” like a blog.  I know it is a recession but M&A activity isn’t necessarily down.  Sure it is no free for all but it is alive in a smarter and more strategic way.

What kind of economy are we creating if independent media doesn’t happen on some sort of liquidity event?  This needs to at least be an option and at most serve as an example of possibilities.  Not to mention strategically it makes more sense to acquire rather than wait for independent media to seek investment from an IAC, MSNBC, and the like or bootstrap their way to the top.  Then they really become your competitors…head on.

I had the opportunity to sit down with Windows 7 Program Manager Cordell Jones. Cordell has worked with Microsoft for the past 14 years, with the past 2 years focused on Windows 7. Some of Cordell’s past project include Microsoft Publisher and Microsoft Exchange. Cordell now works on the networking side of Windows 7.

Cordell is a graduate of Tuskegee University. Enjoy!

Though the BET On Blast video player was nice when it launched a little over 2 years ago video on the web has certainly moved in another direction.  Specifically if you happen to be a television network.  BET.com recently ditched the BET on Blast player, which many thought was hard to navigate, and leveled the playing field with not only it’s sister sites (VH1 and MTV) but networks who have a presence online in general.  While video is the most notable change (and most exciting in my opinion considering where video on the web is going) there are several other changes on the site that aren’t worth over looking.

Video

The familiar player now allows sharing (mainly embedding and URL sharing).  The video library is logical and finally includes the breath of the network’s programming including video’s from artist which plays nice with the artist’s pages we mention below.

Individual videos can also be rated by a user and comments can be added.

Original Webisodes

I actually stumbled across this area when looking into the video programming that was offered.  While not much is there now (mainly video clips) my bet is that BET will get into the game of web original programming and perhaps even allow some form of User Generated Content for their audience.

Artist Pages

Less like Hulu and more like a Topic page for artists.  You can find everything related to an artist on this page including where they are on the social web, see Lil Wayne for an example.  The only thing missing here is to gather news from around the web and not just BET.com.

The community section still needs some work and follows the old site’s format but we’re told other areas to the site will roll out later this year with the complete revamp to be completed in early 2010.  With the adoption of the features above the decision not to syndicate it’s programming across the web on places like Hulu is starting to make more sense on why they’d opt not to.  Looks like they are building a Hulu-like presence on their own.  Should be interesting to also see how Centric is or isn’t incorporated into the site’s content programming.  We reached out prior to publishing but have yet to get a statement from BET.com on the site’s direction and strategy.

(Disclosure:  Black Web 2.0 is the technology content partner for BET.com)

EVERYWHERE, a Social Media Marketing and Content Development firm based in Atlanta, GA set a record October 16-17th for the most widespread social network message in 24 hours. According to Radian6, the official online monitoring company, the phrase #BeatCancer set the record with 209,771 mentions on Twitter, Facebook and blog posts. This translates into an estimated number of impressions generated during this 24-hour period at over 100 Million. Attendees at BlogWorld & New Media Expo, which featured some of the biggest names in social media, were asked to send tweets and issue Facebook status updates with #BeatCancer in their posts. This massive viral effort spawned a worldwide online message that spread and quickly became the #1 most trending topic on Twitter. Not content to just perpetuate a hashtag followed by a message, EVERYWHERE sought out sponsors to raise money for non-profit cancer organizations. Sponsors eBay/PayPal and MillerCoors Brewing Company and Genesis Today were financial contributors to the #BeatCancer campaign and in the brief 24 hour period, over $70,000 was raised.

Of the effort, Guinness World Record® spokesperson, Stuart Claxton said, “We’re always on the lookout for new and exciting ideas, and when approached about a mass social media experiment that rallied people to support the fight against cancer, we were happy to oblige in adjudicating this record attempt.” He further clarified that this attempt “will set a benchmark for social media monitoring moving forward.”

Managing Partner of EVERYWHERE, Tamara Knechtel, who came up with the idea for #BeatCancer says, “We understand very well the power brands have to deliver messages in the social media space. We wanted to score the first Guinness World Record® by using social media for social good. I’m a cancer survivor and just about everyone I know has a close family member who has suffered from the disease. That said, we only had a matter of days to pull this off in time for BlogWorld & New Media Expo. We are grateful to our sponsors, eBay/PayPal and MillerCoors who stepped up to the plate offering a penny per #BeatCancer mention. In the end, they both gave far more than a penny per mention!” EVERYWHERE is now the first social media agency to develop a Guinness World Record for online impressions.

The money raised will be donated to four different non-profit cancer organizations including SU2C (Stand UP to Cancer), Alex’s Lemonade, Bright Pink, and Spirit Jump. All of the non-profits are 501(c)(3) organizations and accredited by The American Cancer Society. A listing of all organizations can be found at www.beatcancereverywhere.com. While the campaign is over, individuals may still donate at the aforementioned website.

The measurement firm Radian 6 provided all of the real-time tracking for the campaign. As of this release the current impressions total over one million mentions of #BeatCancer including tweets sent by athletes and celebrities including P. Diddy, Jermaine Dupri, Larry Fitzgerald, MC Hammer, Perez Hilton, Kim Kardashian, Maxwell, Alicia Keys, Shawne Merriman, and Denise Richards.

Ford is already pretty well known for it’s social media strategy, led by Scott Monty, and was ranked the #1 Social Automotive Brand by Virtue.com.  They not only use social media to engage with current customers (and potential customers) for Ford products, they also use it for Customer Service and to combat “haters” when those situations arise.  In fact I had the opportunity to speak with Gwen Peake (@gwenj), Ford’s new hire for the Global Digital Communications Manager, and she made a point to mention the company “welcomes all comments” good and bad.

Peake’s background is “multimedia” in the truest sense. Throughout her career she has been on a “tour of industries” that are all about communicating to large audiences— she’s been a television producer, a film director, a stage manager for theater, a book editor, a writer for magazines, music and movies, and even owned an online magazine. Most recently she’s joined the Ford team to expand their small but hugely effective social media team to two.

Gwen Peake, Global Digital Communications Manager, Ford Motor Company

While Peake hasn’t been with Ford long she and her team have had a number of wins, including getting Ford CEO Alan Mulally to tweet and engage with bloggers and customers; at one point even taking time on a Saturday to make a phone call to one.  Things like this are just one small part of what Peake and her colleagues are doing to “humanize the brand using social media.”  What may seem like simple use of Twitter and Facebook to a novice is in actuality part of a much larger strategy.  Self proclaimed “social media experts” and “strategist” take note.

At the heart of the effort is theFordStory.com “social media repository.”  This is where you’ll find all things related to what Ford is doing in the social web including first hand stories from customers as well as commentary from the blogosphere.  And yes you’ll find them on Twitter and Facebook but it doesn’t end there.  They are also on Flickr, YouTube, Upcoming, SlideShare, Flickr, Scribd, and Delicious.  They also do blogger outreach and Peake shared that they try to be as human and personable as possible, they contact bloggers more like a friend would and not like a marketer.  Note:  Bloggers if you get form letters from marketers asking for “your help” run…and run fast.

As I mentioned earlier their social media efforts don’t just end with the superficial.  There are many initiatives Ford is apart of as well.  Initiatives like The Wedding Road Trip where a newly engaged couple drove cross country telling friends and family of their news.  InvisiblePeople.tv is another initiative, and a great one at that.  It is a vlog that chronicles the lives of homeless people across America by way of a road trip.   One of the most impressive is the FiestaMovement.com where 100 agents lifestream their time with a Ford Fiesta for 6 months.  Yes Ford sponsors the vehicles in these initiatives but the participants are not paid at all.

I’m sure many of you are familiar with what Ford is doing in the African-American community with vehicles like the Flex.  Those campaigns tend to be less social and are well…just campaigns.  Peake mentioned during our conversation that this is something Ford is aware of and she and her team are tasked with working across the company to make campaigns more socially engaging.  They will be working with various multicultural divisions and we should start to see social media included soon on campaigns targeting the African-American demographic.  Peake not only adds great knowledge to the Social media team at Ford she offers perspective.

Last Monday The Huffington Post announced it would launch a Technology and Innovations section on September 21st.  The section will be lead by Jose Antonio Vargas.  In the blog post last week titled Technology is Anthropology Vargas goes into detail on how this Technology blog will be a bit different than what we are use to.

HuffPostTech will cover how technology in general — and the Internet in particular — is changing the way we live our lives, from politics, education to entertainment. The iPhone 3GS and new Nokia N96 aren’t just cell phones or communications devices; for many, they are primary sources of entertainment. Facebook is no mere social networking site; with more than 250 million users, it’s a democracy of its own, with a population that rivals some of the world’s biggest countries. Indeed, the new section’s overlaying concern — what will connect all the blogs and aggregated news stories in it — is the thinking that technology is anthropology. It’s not the gear, it’s the people.

You can read his thoughts in full over on the HuffPost however, he does go on to say that while they will cover news, rivalries, gadgets and the like most stories will focus on how technology is being used and how it effects the people who use it.  Interesting.

That said, in this world where tech blogs and websites chase the latest of the latest will The Huffington Post be able to take a piece of the pie that is dominated by Michael Arrington and Pete Cashmore?  And should those two be scared?  While a blend of arrogance and confidence will likely display the two as dismissive to the venture, what The Huffington Post stands to bring to Technology & Innovation is the ability for the average Joe to relate to it.  In the long run that could serve as more appealing to the masses than “what’s hot” among geeks and early adopters.

Updated: Here is a quick video from the editor:

Currently there is proposed legislation that would give the President power to seize control of private networks during a national cybersecurity threat.  Proponents of the legislation believe this bill is necessary to protect:

• vital private networks containing personal banking information;

• networks of power and water systems; and

• private citizens’ health records.

However, opponents of the legislation fear that this bill will give the President too much control over private networks and raises significant privacy concerns.

Specifically, section 201 of the legislation allows the President to engage in  “periodic mapping of private networks deemed to be critical, and those companies shall share requested information with the federal government.”  Essentially this language gives the President the authority to continually have access and monitor “critical” networks and force companies who own these networks to hand over private information, as requested, to the President.  Naturally this particular language raises legitimate concerns about privacy and Executive abuse of power.

The Federal Privacy Act provides safeguards and protections against the President’s access to private citizens’ information.  However, in the case of a threat to national security, the President can seize and withhold information on private citizens.  This new proposed legislation regarding cybersecurity potentially violates the Federal Privacy Act because the bill gives the President the power to have access to private networks despite any threat to national security.

Naturally, owners of  “critical” networks do not support the bill in its current state.  Any threat to National Security involving private networks and the internet, does warrant immediate action by the President.  However, the White House’s continued access and monitoring of these networks violates privacy laws and if implemented, will certainly receive legal challenges.

OneRiot has  just closed their Series C round of $7 million led by Appian Ventures, Commonwealth Capital Ventures, and Spark Capital. You may recall us mentioning this real-time search engine in a recent post about the new Digsby.

OneRiot delivers realtime web search results to millions of users, both at OneRiot.com and to 3rd parties who utilize OneRiot’s Search API. The company will use proceeds of this funding to further enhance its core search product and to support its fast-growing partner network.

That partner network is quite impressive. Besides Digsby and now Yoono, OneRiot also has partnered with Yahoo and Microsoft, who recently released a version of Internet Explorer bundled with OneRiot realtime search. It seems that OneRiot is definitely on the road to success.

Using their PulseRank system (something like Google’s Pagerank, but for the real-time web), OneRiot helps you locate the hottest news, stories and videos that people are buzzing about right now on any topic. It pulls in links and content in realtime from services like Twitter and Digg. They also manage their own panel of 3 million users who have opted in to share their realtime information with the service.

OneRiot has taken an interesting path thus far. Rather than trying to pad their service with feature after feature and going through a bunch of redesigns, they have chosen to focus on their backend. They offer a rich API which allows 3rd party developers to easily integrate OneRiot into their offerings. They have focused on creating partnerships with various companies. They have kept the service pretty simple since their launch in 2008. It makes me think they somehow got a hold of Twitter’s playbook.

While I don’t really see a good use for it personally, I can see where it could be a valuable tool for others. As far as real-time goes, I’m used to the fire hose of FriendFeed and you just don’t get that same thing on OneRiot. Maybe if they decide to index services besides just Twitter and Digg, that will change. For now, looks like OneRiot is on the up-and-up. I wonder how they plan to monetize this.