Read Before You Sign: The Battle for Facebook
By now most of you have heard about the lawsuit against Facebook. Web developer Paul Ceglia alleges he paid Mark Zuckerberg $1000 to create code for a project he owned, Street Fax. Ceglia also agreed to assist Zuckerberg with developing Zuckerberg’s project, TheFacebook.com which eventually became Facebook.com.
In exchange for the $1000 and investment by Ceglia into Zuckerberg’s Facebook project, Zuckerberg granted Ceglia a 50% interest in the Facebook website. In addition, Zuckerberg granted the Ceglia an additional 1% of the company for each day after January 1, 2004 (the site completion date) the site remained incomplete. The website was actually finished on February 4, 2004, so 34 days later, Zuckerberg allegedly owned an additional 34% fee. Hence the 84% controversy.
Is the contract valid
I read a copy of the complaint here and if the signature of both parties are proved valid, it is a valid agreement. Apparently, Zuckerberg was a freshman at Harvard University and probably had no idea what he was signing or had any clue of the ramifications of such an agreement. However, ignorance is never an excuse to any legal obligation. There are several situations in which a contract can be cancelled or nullified. They are:
1. If a minor, someone under the age of 18, signed he contract.
2. The person was incapacitated, mentally ill or intoxicated by drugs or alchohol
Zuckerberg was 19 when he signed the contract. He clearly is not mentally ill and there is no evidence he was intoxicated when he signed the agreement.
Resolution
Ceglia is not revealing whether he attempted to settle this contractual dispute with Zuckerberg before filing suit. However, he may be out of luck. The statute of limitations to file a breach of contract lawsuit in the state of New York is six years. The contract was signed in 2003 and Ceglia is just bringing a civil action in 2010. He is one year late. In fact, Facebook’s legal team is making this very argument before the court. Considering this is Facebook’s new strategy to defeat this lawsuit, pretty much confirms the contract was valid.
I predict Facebook and Ceglia will settle this matter out of court. In light of the statute of limitations and the public embarrassment for Zuckerberg, a quick settlement is in both parties best interest.
Category: Law | Tags: black web 2.0, Contractual dispute, facebook, IPLAW101, lawsuit, mark zuckerberg, Paul Ceglia, phillips givens law
this is old news years ago a person from the harvard crimson leak? the email that started the rumours that zuckerberg had siged the contract all those years ago the emails seem to indicate that zuckerberg undercut a guy? who had the same idea this is the point of origin where zuckerberg stole the idea facebook not the winklevoss this guy was in contact about the idea facebook to the winklevoss but stole the idea
zuckerberg stole the platform from the winklevoss but not the idea .So then this guy then went to Aaron Greenspan who was running house systems at Harvard and asked him (under an email non disclosure agreement) to run Facebook on his site which he agreed to do
But aaron greenspan used the (info) to extort financal money out of facebook and zuckerberg paid the extortion money
ben got sent copes of the emails but his book is not the full truth
So are you beginning to see the truth
the truth runs very deep find the truth find this person and you will find the truth
He is not late… he is not charging for breach of contract, just an assertion of ownership. There is no statute of limitations apparently on asserting ownership. Check your facts.