<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Magazine Publishers Team Up for Digital Distribution Venture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackweb20.com/2009/12/11/magazine-publishers-team-up-for-digital-distribution-venture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackweb20.com/2009/12/11/magazine-publishers-team-up-for-digital-distribution-venture/</link>
	<description>The premier destination for African-American’s in Technology and New Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:10:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: benin</title>
		<link>http://www.blackweb20.com/2009/12/11/magazine-publishers-team-up-for-digital-distribution-venture/comment-page-1/#comment-33670</link>
		<dc:creator>benin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackweb20.com/?p=10615#comment-33670</guid>
		<description>This is interesting.  Was talking with a friend (@JameelGordon) of mine the other day and we both came to the conclusion that this is just a sign of big media collectively saying enough is enough.  For the past two to three years they have sort of watched from the side lines as print and TV have become less relevant to increasingly more sophisticated audiences who are able to get the same info not only for free online but also in the format of their choosing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, big media has a lot at stake and they will probably go to great lengths to protect their interests-whether its innovative stuff evidenced by your article, Hulu-like ventures, or this related piece (&lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/y9zc3g7&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/y9zc3g7&lt;/a&gt;) or whether they have to use that muscle to buy innovative firms that are too big of a threat to big media so that by vote they can tone the rhetoric down a tad.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Looking at it from another angle though there is one glaring weakness in new media-there seems to be too much noise.  Everyone is shouting from their own platforms across to other people doing the same thing.  This serves to undermine the integrity of the web as an objective source of information.  What it boils down to is that there are no set in stone standards for disseminating information on the web.  Instead what we have is something more like the Wild West.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So when big media firms begin to distribute premium content or syndicate premium content; while encouraging open standards-like your piece mentions then what it tells me is that they are beginning to attack that weakness of the online environment by bringing a sense of corporate media (order) to the table.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is all a matter of adaptation I suppose.  Thanks for the piece, BTW.  Take care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting.  Was talking with a friend (@JameelGordon) of mine the other day and we both came to the conclusion that this is just a sign of big media collectively saying enough is enough.  For the past two to three years they have sort of watched from the side lines as print and TV have become less relevant to increasingly more sophisticated audiences who are able to get the same info not only for free online but also in the format of their choosing.</p>
<p>Of course, big media has a lot at stake and they will probably go to great lengths to protect their interests-whether its innovative stuff evidenced by your article, Hulu-like ventures, or this related piece (<a href="http://tinyurl.com/y9zc3g7" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/y9zc3g7</a>) or whether they have to use that muscle to buy innovative firms that are too big of a threat to big media so that by vote they can tone the rhetoric down a tad.</p>
<p>Looking at it from another angle though there is one glaring weakness in new media-there seems to be too much noise.  Everyone is shouting from their own platforms across to other people doing the same thing.  This serves to undermine the integrity of the web as an objective source of information.  What it boils down to is that there are no set in stone standards for disseminating information on the web.  Instead what we have is something more like the Wild West.</p>
<p>So when big media firms begin to distribute premium content or syndicate premium content; while encouraging open standards-like your piece mentions then what it tells me is that they are beginning to attack that weakness of the online environment by bringing a sense of corporate media (order) to the table.  </p>
<p>It is all a matter of adaptation I suppose.  Thanks for the piece, BTW.  Take care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benin</title>
		<link>http://www.blackweb20.com/2009/12/11/magazine-publishers-team-up-for-digital-distribution-venture/comment-page-1/#comment-32945</link>
		<dc:creator>benin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 04:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackweb20.com/?p=10615#comment-32945</guid>
		<description>This is interesting.  Was talking with a friend (@JameelGordon) of mine the other day and we both came to the conclusion that this is just a sign of big media collectively saying enough is enough.  For the past two to three years they have sort of watched from the side lines as print and TV have become less relevant to increasingly more sophisticated audiences who are able to get the same info not only for free online but also in the format of their choosing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, big media has a lot at stake and they will probably go to great lengths to protect their interests-whether its innovative stuff evidenced by your article, Hulu-like ventures, or this related piece (&lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/y9zc3g7&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/y9zc3g7&lt;/a&gt;) or whether they have to use that muscle to buy innovative firms that are too big of a threat to big media so that by vote they can tone the rhetoric down a tad.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Looking at it from another angle though there is one glaring weakness in new media-there seems to be too much noise.  Everyone is shouting from their own platforms across to other people doing the same thing.  This serves to undermine the integrity of the web as an objective source of information.  What it boils down to is that there are no set in stone standards for disseminating information on the web.  Instead what we have is something more like the Wild West.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So when big media firms begin to distribute premium content or syndicate premium content; while encouraging open standards-like your piece mentions then what it tells me is that they are beginning to attack that weakness of the online environment by bringing a sense of corporate media (order) to the table.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is all a matter of adaptation I suppose.  Thanks for the piece, BTW.  Take care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting.  Was talking with a friend (@JameelGordon) of mine the other day and we both came to the conclusion that this is just a sign of big media collectively saying enough is enough.  For the past two to three years they have sort of watched from the side lines as print and TV have become less relevant to increasingly more sophisticated audiences who are able to get the same info not only for free online but also in the format of their choosing.</p>
<p>Of course, big media has a lot at stake and they will probably go to great lengths to protect their interests-whether its innovative stuff evidenced by your article, Hulu-like ventures, or this related piece (<a href="http://tinyurl.com/y9zc3g7" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/y9zc3g7</a>) or whether they have to use that muscle to buy innovative firms that are too big of a threat to big media so that by vote they can tone the rhetoric down a tad.</p>
<p>Looking at it from another angle though there is one glaring weakness in new media-there seems to be too much noise.  Everyone is shouting from their own platforms across to other people doing the same thing.  This serves to undermine the integrity of the web as an objective source of information.  What it boils down to is that there are no set in stone standards for disseminating information on the web.  Instead what we have is something more like the Wild West.</p>
<p>So when big media firms begin to distribute premium content or syndicate premium content; while encouraging open standards-like your piece mentions then what it tells me is that they are beginning to attack that weakness of the online environment by bringing a sense of corporate media (order) to the table.  </p>
<p>It is all a matter of adaptation I suppose.  Thanks for the piece, BTW.  Take care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magazine Publishers Team Up for Digital Distribution Venture &#8230; Mobile Advertise</title>
		<link>http://www.blackweb20.com/2009/12/11/magazine-publishers-team-up-for-digital-distribution-venture/comment-page-1/#comment-32938</link>
		<dc:creator>Magazine Publishers Team Up for Digital Distribution Venture &#8230; Mobile Advertise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackweb20.com/?p=10615#comment-32938</guid>
		<description>[...] more here: Magazine Publishers Team Up for Digital Distribution Venture &#8230;          By admin &#124; category: advertising sales &#124; tags: adweek, affect-the-market, makers-insist, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more here: Magazine Publishers Team Up for Digital Distribution Venture &#8230;          By admin | category: advertising sales | tags: adweek, affect-the-market, makers-insist, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.blackweb20.com/2009/12/11/magazine-publishers-team-up-for-digital-distribution-venture/comment-page-1/#comment-32932</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackweb20.com/?p=10615#comment-32932</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by urbanreporter: Magazine Publishers Team Up for Digital Distribution Venture: On the heels of Time Inc.&#039;s digital magazine concept,... http://bit.ly/7ANG3s...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by urbanreporter: Magazine Publishers Team Up for Digital Distribution Venture: On the heels of Time Inc.&#8217;s digital magazine concept,&#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/7ANG3s.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/7ANG3s..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Jewsbury</title>
		<link>http://www.blackweb20.com/2009/12/11/magazine-publishers-team-up-for-digital-distribution-venture/comment-page-1/#comment-32934</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Jewsbury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackweb20.com/?p=10615#comment-32934</guid>
		<description>Anyone can create their own Magazines which will run on any phone/device including the iPhone (but without the need to download from iTunes) at &lt;a href=&quot;http://EyeMags.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;EyeMags.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Try it, it&#039;s totally free to make magazines and download them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone can create their own Magazines which will run on any phone/device including the iPhone (but without the need to download from iTunes) at <a href="http://EyeMags.com" rel="nofollow">EyeMags.com</a></p>
<p>Try it, it&#39;s totally free to make magazines and download them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

