<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tech Week in Review: Chrome, Facebook Boobs, Big Bing, DandyiD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackweb20.com/2009/06/05/tech-week-in-review-chrome-facebook-boobs-big-bing-dandyid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackweb20.com/2009/06/05/tech-week-in-review-chrome-facebook-boobs-big-bing-dandyid/</link>
	<description>The premier destination for African-American’s in Technology and New Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:10:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Download tv show episodes</title>
		<link>http://www.blackweb20.com/2009/06/05/tech-week-in-review-chrome-facebook-boobs-big-bing-dandyid/comment-page-1/#comment-36052</link>
		<dc:creator>Download tv show episodes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 18:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackweb20.com/?p=4700#comment-36052</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://powerrangers.download-tvshows.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://powerrangers.download-tvshows.com/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://powerrangers.download-tvshows.com/" rel="nofollow">http://powerrangers.download-tvshows.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medela</title>
		<link>http://www.blackweb20.com/2009/06/05/tech-week-in-review-chrome-facebook-boobs-big-bing-dandyid/comment-page-1/#comment-33812</link>
		<dc:creator>Medela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackweb20.com/?p=4700#comment-33812</guid>
		<description>1. Facebook is meant to be a private site, within the bounds of safety, it really should have no problem with people posting private, non-sexual images of babies nursing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. I’ve seen plenty acts of violence, stupidity and drunken behavoiur posted to Facebook that all should have been a) removed or b) tagged as offensive. Something positive should not be negatively scrutinized, banned, or sexualized in the name of removing it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3. Comparing nursing a child with a breast to urinating or sex are absurd examples of natural functions - actually not great arguments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;4. Yes, Facebook is a privately owned company, BUT it has based its business and reputation on the inclusion and participation of its members. In the end, it will always do what it feels is in the company’s best interest. As it’s deeply rooted in “the people” - it would do well to listen to popular opinions. If this gets them the feedback they need to allow photos of nursing babies, all the better. People need to keep speaking out. It’s how change happens. It’s how this whole thing started: people tagging breastfeeding pictures as offensive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;5. Everyone need to get a grip and some perspective. What are we all getting so worked up about? A woman feeding her baby as it should be done and as it has been done since humans didn’t have names for it or reason to get offended.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People are so ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Facebook is meant to be a private site, within the bounds of safety, it really should have no problem with people posting private, non-sexual images of babies nursing.</p>
<p>2. I’ve seen plenty acts of violence, stupidity and drunken behavoiur posted to Facebook that all should have been a) removed or b) tagged as offensive. Something positive should not be negatively scrutinized, banned, or sexualized in the name of removing it.</p>
<p>3. Comparing nursing a child with a breast to urinating or sex are absurd examples of natural functions &#8211; actually not great arguments.</p>
<p>4. Yes, Facebook is a privately owned company, BUT it has based its business and reputation on the inclusion and participation of its members. In the end, it will always do what it feels is in the company’s best interest. As it’s deeply rooted in “the people” &#8211; it would do well to listen to popular opinions. If this gets them the feedback they need to allow photos of nursing babies, all the better. People need to keep speaking out. It’s how change happens. It’s how this whole thing started: people tagging breastfeeding pictures as offensive.</p>
<p>5. Everyone need to get a grip and some perspective. What are we all getting so worked up about? A woman feeding her baby as it should be done and as it has been done since humans didn’t have names for it or reason to get offended.</p>
<p>People are so ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medela</title>
		<link>http://www.blackweb20.com/2009/06/05/tech-week-in-review-chrome-facebook-boobs-big-bing-dandyid/comment-page-1/#comment-31260</link>
		<dc:creator>Medela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackweb20.com/?p=4700#comment-31260</guid>
		<description>1. Facebook is meant to be a private site, within the bounds of safety, it really should have no problem with people posting private, non-sexual images of babies nursing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. I’ve seen plenty acts of violence, stupidity and drunken behavoiur posted to Facebook that all should have been a) removed or b) tagged as offensive. Something positive should not be negatively scrutinized, banned, or sexualized in the name of removing it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3. Comparing nursing a child with a breast to urinating or sex are absurd examples of natural functions - actually not great arguments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;4. Yes, Facebook is a privately owned company, BUT it has based its business and reputation on the inclusion and participation of its members. In the end, it will always do what it feels is in the company’s best interest. As it’s deeply rooted in “the people” - it would do well to listen to popular opinions. If this gets them the feedback they need to allow photos of nursing babies, all the better. People need to keep speaking out. It’s how change happens. It’s how this whole thing started: people tagging breastfeeding pictures as offensive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;5. Everyone need to get a grip and some perspective. What are we all getting so worked up about? A woman feeding her baby as it should be done and as it has been done since humans didn’t have names for it or reason to get offended.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People are so ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Facebook is meant to be a private site, within the bounds of safety, it really should have no problem with people posting private, non-sexual images of babies nursing.</p>
<p>2. I’ve seen plenty acts of violence, stupidity and drunken behavoiur posted to Facebook that all should have been a) removed or b) tagged as offensive. Something positive should not be negatively scrutinized, banned, or sexualized in the name of removing it.</p>
<p>3. Comparing nursing a child with a breast to urinating or sex are absurd examples of natural functions &#8211; actually not great arguments.</p>
<p>4. Yes, Facebook is a privately owned company, BUT it has based its business and reputation on the inclusion and participation of its members. In the end, it will always do what it feels is in the company’s best interest. As it’s deeply rooted in “the people” &#8211; it would do well to listen to popular opinions. If this gets them the feedback they need to allow photos of nursing babies, all the better. People need to keep speaking out. It’s how change happens. It’s how this whole thing started: people tagging breastfeeding pictures as offensive.</p>
<p>5. Everyone need to get a grip and some perspective. What are we all getting so worked up about? A woman feeding her baby as it should be done and as it has been done since humans didn’t have names for it or reason to get offended.</p>
<p>People are so ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiffany</title>
		<link>http://www.blackweb20.com/2009/06/05/tech-week-in-review-chrome-facebook-boobs-big-bing-dandyid/comment-page-1/#comment-30887</link>
		<dc:creator>tiffany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackweb20.com/?p=4700#comment-30887</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s also crazy is that Facebook has no problems with Holocaust deniers and white nationalist groups, but OMG TEH BR3ASTF33DING B00BS! really? Seems odd to have more of a problem with functional, no-nipple-showing breasts than with racist groups -- engaging in activity that&#039;s illegal in some countries -- organizing on your site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#39;s also crazy is that Facebook has no problems with Holocaust deniers and white nationalist groups, but OMG TEH BR3ASTF33DING B00BS! really? Seems odd to have more of a problem with functional, no-nipple-showing breasts than with racist groups &#8212; engaging in activity that&#39;s illegal in some countries &#8212; organizing on your site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arisha Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.blackweb20.com/2009/06/05/tech-week-in-review-chrome-facebook-boobs-big-bing-dandyid/comment-page-1/#comment-30885</link>
		<dc:creator>Arisha Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 12:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackweb20.com/?p=4700#comment-30885</guid>
		<description>oh my gosh, i love Chrome...it&#039;s too bad the mac &amp; linux version is half done..but heck, what in the world DOES Google ever develop completely? LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh my gosh, i love Chrome&#8230;it&#39;s too bad the mac &#038; linux version is half done..but heck, what in the world DOES Google ever develop completely? LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

