Quantcast Smooth Mag Blog Struggles | Black Web 2.0

Smooth Mag Blog Struggles

By Nokware Knight | Mon, Feb 23, 2009 2:00 pm

Smooth Mag Blog Struggles

The most popular Black men’s magazines have been having a comparatively hard time adjusting online.  King-mag.com and smoothmag.com have both seen their total traffic in terms of unique visitors per month drop to about half of what it was a year ago.   Much like in the print world, that has left Smooth as an also-ran behind the more popular King Magazine, whose web traffic is still four times that of smoothmag.com.  To make matters worse, dimewars.com has eclipsed smoothmag.com in traffic since last summer, essentially making smoothmag.com the third most popular online magazine targeting black men.

Smooth owes at least some of its digital woes to an identity complex that has faced a number of men’s print magazines forced to move online to stay competitive.  Audience who paid for access to the print magazine have been accustomed to getting what they want for free online.   Advertisers who paid big bucks to showcase their products in magazines are more hesitant to spend the same amount of money marketing online because they have so many more options to choose from and can negotiate to pay far less than they do in print magazines.  To appease the online audience, publishers would either have to give some of their printed content away for free or add original content to its website.  Either way, it costs the magazines more for less return.

Smooth originally put teasers, partial versions of printed articles, on its website to entice readers to buy the printed version.  In a perfect world, the rest of Smooth’s more formidable competition would do something similar, forcing the audience to pay for the content and keep the magazine running profitably with no more than a slight deviation from the original business model.  Black Men Magazine, for instance, chose to put none of its original editorial content online.  King, the leading black men’s magazine in print and online, chose another route that has or will force its competition to follow them on the web.  King published its printed content online as well as added the occasional online-only piece.  In order to to stay competitive on the web, Smooth had to bring something to the table as well.

Instead of giving away content it paid for, Smooth introduced smoothblogger.com sometime between September and October of last year.  Although it seems like little more than a blog with a social networking component, the platform is a unique amongst minority and general interest men’s online magazines.  No noteworthy online men’s magazine has a true social networking component, instead opting to build community through comments and messaging boards, a tactic that has worked well for king-mag.com and askmen.com in particular.  If smoothblogger.com were to ever catch on among its niche and fringe audiences, it could very well decrease the distance between Smooth and its online competitors.

Still, it’s been at least five months since smoothblogger.com launched, and the results are less than impressive.  As of this posting, the site has fewer than 800 members and hardly more than a handful of visitors signed in at any given time.  Part of the reason may be that a men’s lifestyle magazine social network doesn’t give much reason for its audience to talk to one another.  Most social networks thrive off of mutual interest among members that include business, careers, sex, or specific community-based interests such as art, politics, music, under-the-table activities, poetry, etc.  They are probably the only reasons people see a benefit in promoting  a friends list or sending notes to directly to individuals rather than just joining in on publicly displayed forums and comment boards.  Myspace thrives in part because many of its members use the site to openly promote their interests in music and entertainment or to date other members.  Until recently, BlackPlanet was a social network with a reputation for being little more than a dating service.

Many of the women who join smoothblogger.com are current and aspiring models who are there to promote their careers more than interact with the rest of smoothblogger.com community.   Men on smoothblogger.com probably have little to no motivation to talk directly to or make friends with one another.  It’s not like they are using the site to cut deals behind the scene.

Smooth still should move forward with the site, as its the one place its competitors are not a step ahead of them.  But smoothblogger.com needs to find its purpose and its focus fast, a particular set of reasons for why readers of the magazine would sign up to be members of its social network.  It can start by dedicating a handful of bloggers to specific subjects in order to give the site some editorial authority and a reason for readers to go there first.   Smooth would also likley benefit from better cross-promotional marketing and integration that more closely associates smoothblogger.com, smoothmag.com, and Smooth Magazine with one another.

Category: Blog, Social Networking, Startups, Strategy, Web 2.0, blogging, social media

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts


This post was written by:

Nokware Knight - who has written 12 posts on Black Web 2.0.


Contact the author

  • markusrobinson
    Content is king, and there's nothing smooth about Smooth's online content. The website has no clear vision, and looks more like soft porn than a men's magazine. I think if anything, they need to focus on quality online content and sprinkle the cover girls in the mix.

    As for their social media aspirations, I agree, adding their content to a Ning site is far from a social media plan. Social media, like you mentioned, creates conversations around content, and this content is not worth talking about.
  • Indeed it is, there's no second thoughts about it, content is the king! I have observed it so many times!
  • I'm no guy - but is this all Black men care about? I don't think so. Markus is right - content is king - not boobs and booty -- at least not all the time guys -- right? I think they will bring lots of new readers to their sites but mixing up their content with other interests of Black men and do it without pushing booty in their faces - they will be surprised who would show up. I know lots of guys that read these pubs and I know lots that don't and that is main reason. HipHop+Female Body Parts - Black men are so much more than that.

    ok..im done...
  • Smooth has always seemed like the mens magazine that was ashamed to be a mens magazine. And a website/network aimed at men shouldn't be filled with post about hot bags, heels, and oscar dresses.
    Smooth need to follow the lead of mags like Complex and Maxim who's sites and blogs are great extensions of their magazine
  • BlackAgencyGuy
    Complex gives free magazine subscriptions to major agencies. I love my subscription. I'm not sure if this is the best strategy because it kills more trees than anything else (most of the women in the office toss the magazines in the garbage or just out in a common area -- especially the white girls). It has won them some ad dollars though....that I can confirm.
  • BlackAgencyGuy
    @markus...there is nothing wrong with a company using an existing platform to build a site (don't have to re-build the wheel all the time).

    @dede...yes there is a market for high end booty and the lifestyle that surrounds it (smokes, cigars, cars, music, bling, and fashion -- those categories in and of itself represent 10s of millions per month in ad spend even in a recession)....will all advertisers want to align with it? of course not. The problem for many of these sites is that they always have to walk a tightrope of not going over into what would be considered risque to keep quality advertisers

    Their problem is just that its too much free risque model content online and entertainment blogs are nothing new at all.

    @DJ .... 100% agree ... a better focused vision would be better
  • markusrobinson
    I agree. I don't have a problem with the site using Ning, but Ning alone just wont do it. You have to create content worth talking about and Smooth's content isn't worth talking about.
  • BlackAgencyGuy
    regular exclusive model interviews and interviews of hip hop celebs could turn things around and make them a creator of content and not regurgitator like 98% of urban entertainment blogs are.

    I hope to see more black men's interest magazines...there are not a lot of well done options out there today
  • janu
    PS. You should seriously STOP REFERRING TO COMPETE in your articles. Compete is as unreliable as Alexa. At least check traffic data on Quantcast and compare, some of the sites you write about might be directly quantified by Quantcast. Sorry about the all caps, this compete thing as the new benchmark is getting old, but enough is enough.
  • Janu. - You are right. Compete is not the only source available and should not be used as such. But it is still is a reputable tool that should be used and not ignored, especially when the traffic is directly measured,. I agree that it should be used with responsibility and in context of whatever else is available.

    In this case we did use Quantcast as well. At the time of the post Quantcast and Compete has similar numbers. The only difference is that Compete allows for comparison on a single graph at once. The only thing thing that has changed since this post is that dimewars.com is now measured directly on Quantcast. They have much more traffic than originally estimated by Compete or Quantcast. But again this was after this entry was already posted.

    It's also the reason that we use other ways to evaluate media properties. In the case of smoothblogger, this included number of members, active members, content on the site, and interaction between members.

    But please feel free to share whatever tools you may find. The input is always appreciated and I for one always look to provide readers with the best information available.
blog comments powered by Disqus